Ch. Chandra Shekar Vs Kum. N.Jyothi Padmaja

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY CRIMINAL PETITION No.13623 of 2015

ORDER:

This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3 in C.C.No.88 of 2015 on the file of the Court of IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally at Miyapur, Ranga Reddy District.

¶4

At the time of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has sought permission of this Court to permit the petitioners to withdraw the criminal petition with liberty to avail all the remedies available to them under law including filing of a petition for discharge. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners 1 and 2/accused Nos.1 and 2 are facing much difficulty to attend the trial Court on each and every date of adjournment and hence, their presence before the trial Court may be dispensed with.

¶5

Permission is granted.

¶6

Hence, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to avail all the remedies available to them under law including filing of a petition for discharge, if charges are already not framed. Petitioner No.1 is the Sub-Inspector of Police and petitioner No.2 is the mother of petitioner No.1. There is no dispute with regard to the identity of the petitioners 1 and 2/Accused Nos.1 and 2. Even if the presence of petitioners 1 and 2/A1 and A2 is dispensed with, no prejudice would be caused to the first respondent. Hence, the presence of the petitioners 1 and 2/A1 and A2 is dispensed with before the Court of IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally, at Miyapur, Ranga Reddy District, on each

¶7

and every date of adjournment. However, they shall appear before the trial Court as and when their presence is so required.

¶8

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.

¶9

_____________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J

¶10

Date:21.12.2015 Rns

Ch. Chandra Shekar v. Kum. N.Jyothi Padmaja

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ch. Chandra Shekar v. Kum. N.Jyothi Padmaja

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Matta Anand Paul Vs The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp

Vema Reddy Venku Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Jayanthilal Bagrecha Vs The State of a.P.,rep.,Pp

T. Narsimhulu Vs The state of A.P.

Noor Mahmood , Mohd. Mahmood Vs Syed Abdul Firdose, son of Syed Abdul Aziz

J. Janardhanan Vs The State of A.P