This single-paragraph order allows a Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings against accused Nos. 1 to 3. The Court found that the parties had settled the dispute outside the Court and no objections to quashing existed.
Criminal Petition allowed; proceedings in Crime No.393 of 2014 quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY CRIMINAL PETITION No.12985 of 2014
ORDER:
This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.393 of 2014 of Narsingi Police Station, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District.
Heard the learned counsels for the petitioners, second respondent and the learned Public Prosecutor representing the State.
The relevant portion of the counter of the second respondent reads as follows:
“I submit that in view of my settlement of all issues with the petitioners, I do not have any objections to this Hon’ble Court quashing the FIR, as prayed by the petitioners.”
A perusal of the same reveals that the parties have settled the matter. Both counsels in one voice submitted that the parties have settled the matter outside the Court.
Having regard to the submissions made by both counsels, it is a fit case to quash the proceedings.
Hence, the Criminal Petition is allowed quashing the proceedings in Crime No.393 of 2014 of Narsingi Police Station, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District, against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
_____________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J
Date:09.12.2015 Rns
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings can be quashed on the ground that the parties have settled the matter outside the Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioners/accused Nos. 1 to 3
Second respondent
The State
T. Sunil Chowdary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
