Criminal petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail for offences of cheating and forgery was dismissed as bail had been previously denied without any changed circumstances.
Criminal Petition No.10951 of 2015 and miscellaneous petitions pending are dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.10951 of 2015
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner-accused No.1 under Sections 438 Cr.P.C. seeking to grant anticipatory bail to him in Crime No.385 of 2015 on the file of Nallapadu Police Station, Guntur Urban, Guntur District, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 419, 420, 465, 468, 471 and 506 r/w 34 IPC.
Heard and perused the material available on record.
It is alleged that after death of the husband of the de facto complainant, she became absolute owner of the property in question. But A1 created a document in favour of A2 in respect of the said property. They created forged documents particularly the sale deed dated 7.10.2002 purported to have been executed by the mother-in-law of the de facto complainant. But the mother-in-law of the de facto complainant died in the year 1998.
The earlier bail application filed by the petitioner was dismissed on 8.10.2015. There are no changed circumstances. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner-A1.
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand dismissed.
JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO
Dated: 29.10.2015
Nn
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.10951 of 2015
29.10.2015
Nn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner-accused in view of lack of changed circumstances.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioner-accused No.1
De facto complainant
Raja Elango
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
