Petitioner filed a contempt case alleging disobedience of an order in W.P. No.10793 of 2011. Court noted respondents' compliance via regularization of petitioner's services. Closed the contempt case.
Contempt case closed; no penalty imposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE NO.33 OF 2013
DATED:11-9-2015
Between:
K. Satyanarayana … Petitioner And
C. Vinod Kumar and others … Respondents … Respondents COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER: Mr. P. Venkateswar Rao COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENTS: Mr. N. Vasudeva Reddy, Standing Counsel for T.S.R.T.C.
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed alleging disobedience of order dt.19.4.2011 in W.P. No.10793 of 2011.
On behalf of the respondents, respondent No.1 has filed a counter affidavit wherein it is inter alia stated that the services of the petitioner were regularized with effect from 01.1.2010 vide proceedings No.P6/123(2)/2012-RR, dt.17.7.2013, of Regional Manager, Ranga Reddy Division, Hyderabad.
Mr. P. Venkatesar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that in view of the above mentioned proceedings by which the petitioner’s services have been regularized, the respondents have complied with the order in W.P. No.10793 of 2011.
In the light of the above, the contempt case is closed.
C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
11-9-2015
bnr
K. Satyanarayana
C. Vinod Kumar
C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
