Ordered closed: The contempt case was officially closed as the orders were implemented by the respondents, resulting in no order as to costs. No other legal principles were applied or discussed in this brief order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.1581 OF 2015
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for respondents.
2. Respondents are present in person. It is represented by the learned counsel on both sides that the orders were implemented.
3. In the circumstances, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J
Date: 12.11.2015
TJMR
A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
