The court recorded a compromise between the parties in two civil appeals under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC and disposed of the petitions and appeals accordingly.
Petition ordered; appeal disposed of in terms of compromise; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
A.S.M.P.No. 1363 OF 2015
IN/AND
A.S.No. 861 OF 2013
COMMON JUDGMENT:
Both the parties are present and they are identified by their respective counsel. The contents of the memorandum of compromise are read over to the parties and they admitted that they voluntarily entered into the compromise.
In view of the compromise arrived between the parties, I find that it is a fit case to record the compromise by exercising power under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, the petition is ordered.
In view of the orders passed in A.S.M.P.No. 1363 of 2015, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the memorandum of compromise. Pending miscellaneous petitions in this appeal, if any, shall stand closed in consequence. No order as to costs.
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J. Date: 10-07-2015. JSK
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.Satyanarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
