Disposed
Smt. P.Rajya Laxmi v. The Lakshmi Vilas Bank Ltd.
Telangana HCAS/685/2009
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ÐÏࡱá>þÿ
35þÿÿÿ2ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ð¿ÕbjbjqPqP 5::¯%ÿÿÿÿÿÿ¤‚ ‚ ‚ 8º Æ ¤zî î "#%%%%%%$h†pII^888ô#8#88³ÿâ @ïíȫЂ dË#t0¤Ó,öhÐöÿöÿ$8II8¤¤¾Ä¾ÿÿÿÿHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY A.S.M.P.Nos. 608 and 609 of 2015 And A.S.No.685 of 2009 COMMON JUDGMENT: A.S.M.P.No.608 of 2015 is filed by the petitioners/appellants to direct the Court below to allow them to withdraw Rs.2.00 lakhs deposited by them as per the direction of this Court in the Appeal, to the credit of O.S.No.473 of 2007 on the file of I Additional Senior Civil Judge, R.R.District at L.B.Nagar. A.S.M.P.No.609 of 2015 is filed by the petitioners/appellants seeking permission to withdraw the appeal as they settled the matter outside the Court. Sri K.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned counsel for the respondents reported no objection to allow these petitions. Hence the petitions are allowed. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn by permitting the petitioners/appellants to withdraw Rs.2.00 lakhs lying in the credit of O.S.No.473 of 2007 on the file of I Additional Senior Civil Judge, R.R.District at L.B.Nagar. _____________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J 15-06-2015 nvl PAGE PAGE 2 .OUiz{G ÀÈ,‚‘¯°²³µ¶¸¹»¼ÂÃÄÆÇÍÎÏÐÑÓÔÕöëöëàëöØÔØȾë¶Ô¶Ô¶Ô¶Ô¬¦¬¦¢¬¦¬—¬¦¢Ôëh[Ž0JmHnHuh[Ž
**h[Ž0Jjh[Ž0JUjh/HÀUh/HÀOJQJ^Jh/HÀCJOJQJ^Jh/HÀh/HÀOJQJh/HÀ5>OJQJh/HÀ>OJQJ\h/HÀOJQJ\#-.OUiz{¯ G ³ ÀÔ,‚‘’“”•– —˜™úõúúúìçååååÛÛÖÔÔúúúúúúúú$a$ Æк dðdð„dð„dðdh¯Ôþþ™š›œžŸ ¡¢£¤¥¦§¨©ª«¬®¯±² ´µ·¸úúúúúúúúúúúúúúúúúúúúúúøøøøøødh¸º»ÄÅÆÑÒÓÔÕýýôòýôòýýídh„üÿ„&#$ 3 0&P1h°Ð/
°ÀN!°p"°p#p$p%°°Ð°ÐІœ@@ñÿ@NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH R@R Heading 1$$@&a$5CJOJPJQJ^JDA@òÿ¡DDefault Paragraph FontVi@óÿ³VTable Normal :Vö4Ö4Ö laö(k@ôÿÁ(No ListB>@òBTitle$dàa$5OJQJ^J\C@\Body Text Indent$„Ðdà`„Ða$OJQJ^J>> Footnote TextCJaJ@&¢!@Footnote ReferenceH*JP@2JBody Text 2$dàa$OJQJ^J4@B4Header ÆàÀ!.)@¢Q.Page Number4 b4Footer ÆàÀ!Õÿÿÿÿ-.OUiz{¯G³ÀÔ,‚‘’“”•–—˜™š›œžŸ ¡¢£¤¥¦§¨©ª«¬
®¯²ÄÅÆÑÒÖIˆ0Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€Iˆ0€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€ ÙIˆ00]6805_2009Iˆ00ÙIˆ00ÙIˆ00TÙ $$$$$'Õ™¸Õ Ô '!•!tÿ•€.9pxõú“Ÿ£¬KYZ]DI¤°´½®¯¯±±²²´µ·¸º»ÃÆÐÓÖ®¯¯±±²²´µ·¸º»ÆÐÖ,89:NOSYhix{À‚„ª®¯¯±±²²´µ·¸º»ÃÆÐÖþ:°Lè¦&ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ„¼„ªûƼ^„¼„ªûo()€ „ž„˜þÆž^„ž„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „n „LÿÆn ^„n „Lÿ‡hˆH.€ „> „˜þÆ> ^„> „˜þ‡hˆH.€ „„˜þÆ^„„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „Þ„LÿÆÞ^„Þ„Lÿ‡hˆH.€ „®„˜þÆ®^„®„˜þ‡hˆH.€ „~„˜þÆ~^„~„˜þ‡hˆH.‚ „N„LÿÆN^„N„Lÿ‡hˆH.þ: °Lÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿh$× @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @å'[Ž/HÀÿ@€Ì7.Õ@@ÿÿUnknownÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿGï:àAxÀ ÿTimes New Roman5€Symbol3&ÿ:àCxÀ ÿArialA&‡ŸTrebuchet MS7&ÿ¡[ @ŸVerdanaI&€ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿé?ÿ?Arial Unicode MS"1ˆðÐhm¢6Çm¢6Ç ‹6g²ý²ý±ðpp ´´42ƒQðÜHPðÿ?äÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ'2ÿÿHON BLE SRI JUSTICE MNVL-1 cmsectionþÿà…ŸòùOh«‘+'³Ù0€˜¸ÄÔàð 0<H ThpxäHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MNVL-1Normalcmsection2Microsoft Office Word@@ÚKȨÐ@ºu¬«Ð@ºu¬«Ð²ýþÿÕÍÕœ.“—+,ù®0hpˆ˜ ¨°¸À ÈêäWipro LimitedæHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MTitle þÿÿÿþÿÿÿ !þÿÿÿ#$%&'()þÿÿÿ+,-
./01þÿÿÿýÿÿÿ4þÿÿÿþÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ Entryÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÀF üÈ«Ð6€Data ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ
1TableÿÿÿÿWordDocumentÿÿÿÿ5SummaryInformation(ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ"DocumentSummaryInformation8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ*CompObjÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿqÿÿ ÿÿÿÿ ÀFMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.8ô9²q
Petitioners/Appellants
Respondents
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court