P.Srinivasarao Kakinada E.G.Dt v. G.Satyanarayana Kothamanjeru KAKINADAAND3
Case brief
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY…
SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
A.S.No.1318 OF 1997
JUDGMENT:
Kum Soumya, Advocate representing Sri V.V.L.N.Sarma, learned counsel for the appellant sought time to obtain instructions from the party, but refused as the matter is already listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ and the appeal relates to 1997.
When the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, seeking time to obtain instructions from the client is not justifiable. Therefore, appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, filed in this appeal shall stand closed.
_________________________________ M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY,J 02.09.2015 kvrm
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
A.S.No.1318 OF 1997
DATE: 02.09.2015
kvrm
M.Satyanarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court