Union of India v. Gandi Sandhya
Case brief
What is this about?
The Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous because the Tribunal's direction allowed respondents to appear for a scheduled examination, rendering any further order unnecessary.
The Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous because the Tribunal's direction allowed respondents to appear for a scheduled examination, rendering any further order unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU AND
HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIS
WRIT PETITION No.31466 OF 2012
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners represented that the cause in the writ petition does not survive, because the direction given by the Tribunal to the petitioners is to allow the respondents to appear for the examination that was going to be held at 5.00 P.M., on 30.03.2012. Therefore, no order is required to be passed in this writ petition.
Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
___________ JUSTICE ANIS
Date:02.07.2014 INL
K.C. BHANU
ANIS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court