Disposed
Smt.Ravulapati Ahalya Rani v. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Panchayat Raj and Rural
Telangana HCWP/3064/2009
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
null
What did the court decide?
null
What the court decided
AI extract
null
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION NO.3064 OF 2009
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief.
“…to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the Memo No.6625/Pts.IV.A2/20031 dated 09.02.2004 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the 2nd respondent not to accord permission on the basis of the above memo…”
When the matter is taken up today, it is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the fourth respondent that there is no proposal to install the cell tower at the disputed place.
In view of the above submission, there is no necessity of adjudicating the matter further.
For the aforesaid reasons and having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the fourth respondent, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_______________ (A.V.SESHA SAI, J)
25th September 2014 RRB
Petitioner
Respondents (unnamed in text)
A.V.SESHA SAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court