Sevakaula Narahari v. The Station House Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
Order declaring the writ petition infructuous and dismissing it. The petition is dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending are closed.
Order declaring the writ petition infructuous and dismissing it. The petition is dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending are closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.24947 of 2008
ORDER:
It is represented by Sri T.Rajesh, counsel, representing Sri Syed Talha Hussain, the learned counsel for petitioners that nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition and has become infructuous.
2. Recording the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
_______________________________ A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J
Date: 20.03.2014 TJMR
Syed Talha Hussain
A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court