5. As seen from the said revised seniority list, dated 21.03.2002, the petitioner was reverted by proceedings, dated 24.05.1997, which was questioned after lapse of five years before the Tribunal. The judgment in O.A.No.873 of 1992 has become final. It is not the case of petitioner that the revised seniority list, dated 21.03.2002, is not in accordance with the Rules. Once the revised seniority list, dated 21.03.2002, attained finality and promotions were given as a consequential effect, necessarily some persons have to be reverted. Therefore, without challenging the final seniority list, dated 21.03.2002, consequential reversion cannot be challenged. If the relief, which was sought for in the Original Application No.434 of 2002 has to be granted, it is nothing but revising the final seniority list, dated 21.03.2002. Therefore, the Tribunal after considering all these aspects, rightly dismissed the Original Application and that order needs no interference by this Court.