The petitioner argued the writ petition had become infructuous. The court recorded this submission and dismissed the writ petition accordingly without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI
W.P.No.22425 of 2006
Between:
S.V. Raghavacharyulu
PETITIONER
AND
1. National Housing Bank, owned by the Reserve Bank of India, represented by its Manager, New Delhi, and another.
RESPONDENTS
ORDER:
It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
The said submission is recorded and the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________ JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI.
1st September, 2014 Js.
S.V. Raghavacharyulu
National Housing Bank
Reserve Bank of India
A.V. Sesha Sai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
