Allowed

Tadi Ramulamma, v. The Sub Registrar

Telangana HC27 Jun 2014WP/17651/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph order disposed of a writ petition challenging the insistence by sub-registrars on Revenue NOCs for property registration. The court directed the respondent to receive and process documents without insisting on NOCs if they meet statutory requirements.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent to receive and process petitioner's documents without insisting on NOCs and register if requirements under Registration Act and Stamp Act are met.

Tadi Ramulamma, Vs The Sub Registrar — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2014)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.17651 of 2014

¶3

Dated : 27.06.2014

¶4

Between: Tadi Ramulamma, W/o Demulla Naidu, Hindu, 68 yrs., R/o 7-15-12, Srinidhi street, Old Gazuwaka junction, Visakhapatnam. .. Petitioner And The Sub-Registrar, Lankelapalem, Parawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District and another

¶5

.. Petitioner

¶6

.. Respondents

¶7

This Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶8

WRIT PETITION No.17651 of 2014

¶9

ORDER :

¶10

In this writ petition the only grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the insistence by the registering authorities on production of ‘No Objection Certificates’ (NOCs) from the Revenue Authorities as a condition precedent for receiving and registering the documents presented by her for registration in connection with immovable properties.

¶11

2. When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue submit that the subject matter to the extent of No Objection Certificate is squarely covered by the decision of Division Bench in W.A.No.1653 of 2013. With the consent of both counsel, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. Learned counsel for petitioner also submits that the land in issue is not assigned to Ex-Servicemen. 3. Considering the submissions of both the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Sub-Registrar, Lankelapalem, Parawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District

¶12

(1^st respondent) to receive and process the documents presented by the petitioner without insisting upon such NOC and in the event the documents presented fulfil the requirements of the Registration Act, 1908, and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, he shall register and release the documents in accordance with the due procedure. However, if the 1^st respondent is of the opinion that the documents presented for registration warrants denial, he shall pass orders in writing indicating the reasons for such refusal and communicate the same to the party in accordance with Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶13

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.

¶14

__________________________

¶15

JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶16

Date : 27.06.2014 ssp

Tadi Ramulamma, v. The Sub Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tadi Ramulamma, v. The Sub Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Rachapalli Usha Rani, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Secretary

Subhadra PurushottamKoratkar Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

M.Gangappa Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal

Smt M.Jameela Begum Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

G. Vijayakumari, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Pasupulati Rangaiah, Vs The State Rep. by its Commissioner