In this writ petition, counsel submitted that the cause did not survive and had become infructuous. The High Court accepted this submission and dismissed the petition on that ground without proceeding further.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
W.P.No. 11002 of 2004
DATE: 25.04.2014
Between: Karri Veerayamma .. Petitioner And The Mandal Revenue Officer and two others .. Respondents
O R D E R:-
Sri D.Tharu, Advocate, representing Sri N.(P). Anjanadevi Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in this writ petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous.
In view of the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs.
_______________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J
25.04.2014 bcj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives given the submission that the cause has become infructuous.
Karri Veerayamma
The Mandal Revenue Officer and two others
Challa Kodanda Ram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
