Dismissed

Mohammed Moiz Ahmed v. Government of A.P.

Telangana HC10 Apr 2014WP/10868/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment disposes of a writ petition challenging the requirement of a No Objection Certificate for registering immovable property documents. The court directed the Sub-Registrar to register compliant documents without the certificate and to issue written reasons for rejection if applicable under Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Sub-Registrar to receive, process, and register documents relating to immovable property without insisting on a No Objection Certificate, provided they fulfill statutory requirements unde

Mohammed Moiz Ahmed Vs Government of A.P. — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

¶2

THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN

¶3

Present

¶4

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶5

WRIT PETITION No.10868 of 2014

¶6

Between:

¶7

Mohammed Moiz Ahmed S/o. Mohd. Gulam Ahmed, Aged about 52 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.11-6-825/1/A, Red Hills, Hyderabad.

¶8

.. Petitioner

¶9

AND

¶10

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Stamps & Registration) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & 2 others

¶11

.. Respondents

¶12

The Court made the following:

¶13

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶14

WRIT PETITION No.10868 of 2014

¶15

ORDER:

¶16

In this writ petition, the only grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the insistence by the registering authorities on production of ‘No Objection Certificate’ (NOC) from the Revenue Authorities as a condition precedent for receiving and registering the document presented by him for registration in connection with immovable property.

¶17

2. When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue submit that the subject matter to the extent of No Objection Certificate is squarely covered by the decision of Division Bench in W.A.No.1653 of 2013. With the consent of both the learned counsel, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. Learned counsel for petitioner also submits that the land in issue is not assigned to Ex-Servicemen.

¶18

3. Considering the submissions of both the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Sub-Registrar, Warangal, Warangal District (2^nd respondent) to receive and process the document presented by the petitioner without insisting upon such NOC and in the event the document presented fulfils the requirements of the Registration Act, 1908, and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, he shall register and release the document in accordance with the due procedure. However, if the 2^nd respondent is of the opinion that the document presented for registration warrants denial, he shall pass orders in writing indicating the reasons for such refusal and communicate the same to the party in accordance with Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.

¶19

______________________ JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶20

Date: 10^th April, 2014 KL

¶21

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶22

WRIT PETITION No.10868 of 2014

¶23

Date: 10^th April, 2014

¶24

Mohammed Moiz Ahmed v. Government of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Moiz Ahmed v. Government of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Venkat Narayan Reddy S/o. Late Krishna Reddy , Kista Vs The Land Acquisition Officer-cum-

Thota Sattaiah, Vs The Land Acquisition Officer-cum-Special Dy. Collector

Shaik Wali Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary

B.Adhilakshmi Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Inampudi Sri Lakshmi, W/o.I.Koteswara Rao Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh

D.L.Aswathanarayana, Vs The Govt. of A.P.