Petitioner failed to appear twice without representation. Court noted lack of interest in prosecuting the writ petition and dismissed it by default.
Writ Petition dismissed for default; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU AND
THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIS
WRIT PETITION No.10056 OF 2002
ORDER:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice K.C.Bhanu)
When the matter had come up on 20.8.2014, none appeared for the petitioner and there was no representation on his behalf, and therefore, the matter was posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today also, when the matter has come up for hearing, none appears for the petitioner and there is no representation on his behalf. Therefore, the petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting his case.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
JUSTICE K.C.BHANU
JUSTICE ANIS Date: 21.8.2014 AMD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU AND
THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIS
WRIT PETITION No.10056 OF 2002
DATE: 21.8.2014
AMD
Petitioner
Respondent
K.C. Bhanu
Anis
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
