Writ appeal dismissed for default as no representation was filed by the appellants on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT APPEAL NO.265 OF 2003
DATED: 10-04-2014
Between:
Smt. T. Radhamma and others … Appellants And
V. Nagamani and others ... Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT APPEAL NO.265 OF 2003
JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
None appears for the appellants. The writ appeal is dismissed for default. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.
______________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
_____________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 10-04-2014 Svv
Smt. T. Radhamma and others
Nagamani and others
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
Sanjay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
