The writ appeal was dismissed for default as no representation was filed by the appellant on the date of hearing, after counsel reported client had taken the file.
The writ appeal was dismissed for default; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
Writ Appeal No.2065 of 2004
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy)
The writ appeal was listed ‘for hearing’, on 03.07.2014. Learned counsel for the appellant reported that the client has taken away the file from him. However, no arrangement has been made. Therefore, we directed that the matter to be listed today, ‘for Dismissal’. Today, there is no representation for the appellant.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.
The miscellaneous petition filed in this writ appeal shall also stand disposed of.
____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J.
_____________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J.
Date:07.07.2014
GJ
L. Narasimha Reddy
Challa Kodanda Ram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
