The Chief Justice noted the petitioner's submission that he would approach the police station. Consequently, the Court closed the Public Interest Litigation without passing any order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
Public Interest Litigation No.204 of 2014
DATED:4.8.2014
Between: K.R. Vijay, Secunderabad. … Petitioner And Union Ministry of Railways, Government of India, New Delhi and others.
….Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
Public Interest Litigation No.204 of 2014
Order: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
The petitioner, who appears as party in person submits that he will approach the appropriate police station giving information, as has been alleged in the present petition.
In view of the submission, we close the Public Interest Litigation without passing any order. However, the petitioner may be free to approach the appropriate forum.
The miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed. No costs.
__________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
_________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 4th August, 2014
pnb
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
MAIN CASE NO: Writ Petition No.16895 of 2001
PROCEEDING SHEET
| SL. NO. |
DATE | ORDER | OFFICE NOTE |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.7.2014 | HCJ & SK, J | |||
| W.P. dismissed as infructuous. | ||||
| (order pronounced vide separate sheet) |
pnb |
K.R. Vijay
Union Ministry of Railways
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta
Sanjay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
