Allowed

Allada Sreenivasa Rao, v. Jana Jaya Bharati

Telangana HC10 Jun 2014FCA/4/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The appellant, aggrieved by a decree from the Family Court for dissolution of marriage, filed an appeal. During the pendency, the parties executed a compromise memorandum settling maintenance payments. The court recorded the compromise and granted the appellant a decree of divorce, dissolving the marriage as per the agreed terms.

What did the court decide?

Compromise petition allowed; Family Court Appeal dismissed; Decree of divorce granted dissolving the marriage.

Allada Sreenivasa Rao, Vs Jana Jaya Bharati — Matrimonial and Divorce | Telangana HC (2014)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND

¶2

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR

¶3

NARAYANA

¶4

F.C.A M.P No.229 OF 2014

¶5

IN/AND

¶6

FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.4 OF 2013

¶7

COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Subhash Reddy)

¶8

This appeal is filed by the appellant – husband under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, aggrieved by the order and decree, dated 05-11-2012, passed in O.P. No.502 of 2009, by the learned Judge, Additional Family Court, Hyderabad.

¶9

2. The aforesaid O.P. was filed by the appellant herein under Section 13 (1) (i-a) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking dissolution of marriage between him and the respondent - wife.

¶10

3. During pendency of the appeal, F.C.A. M.P. No.229 of 2014 is filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to record compromise entered into between him and the respondent. In the affidavit filed in support of the petition,

¶11

it is stated that at the intervention of elders, matter has been settled between the appellant and respondent, accordingly, the same was reduced into writing by way of compromise and it was also decided to obtain a decree of divorce, by dissolving the marriage between them subject to certain conditions.

¶12

4. As per the terms of compromise, the appellant – husband has agreed to pay an amount of Rs.4,75,000/(Rupees four lakhs and seventy five thousand only) to the respondent – wife in two installments, towards full and final settlement of future maintenance of their daughter and out of the said amount, the appellant has already paid an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees two lakhs only) to the respondent and agreed to pay the remaining amount of Rs.2,75,000/- (Rupees two lakhs and seventy five thousand only) at the time of recording the terms of compromise before the Court. The parties enclosed the memorandum of compromise along with the said application, which indicates the agreed terms between the parties.

¶13

5. Today, when the mater is called, both the parties are present. They have stated that the matter between them has been settled and requested to dispose of the appeal by recording the terms of compromise and grant a decree of divorce, dissolving their marriage.

¶14

6. During the course of hearing, the respondent – wife has informed that she has already received the first installment amount of Rs.2,00,000/- from the appellant. Now, the appellant – husband handed over a demand draft bearing No.221992, dated 09-06-2014 obtained in the name of the respondent – wife from State Bank of India, Visakhapatnam Branch, to the respondent – wife and the respondent – wife acknowledged the receipt of the same.

¶15

7. In view of the request made by the parties and having regard to the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the application, F.C.A.M.P. No.229 of 2014 is allowed as prayed for. Consequently, Family Court Appeal No.4 of 2013 is disposed of, dissolving the marriage of the appellant with the respondent by way of decree of divorce in terms of the compromise entered by them. The terms of memorandum of compromise shall form part of the decree.

¶16

8. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this appeal, stand disposed of.

¶17

________________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J

¶18

A. SHANKAR NARAYANA, J

¶19

June 10, 2014. Mgr

Allada Sreenivasa Rao, v. Jana Jaya Bharati

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Allada Sreenivasa Rao, v. Jana Jaya Bharati

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vs M. Sreenivasa Reddy

R.D.O.(L.a.O.) Kurnool Vs S.Siddappa

The Revenue Divisional Officer Vs G. Venkata Ramana Reddy

V. Narsi Reddy Vs Spl. Tahsildar (La) Railways

Chukka Ramulu Vs Special Tahsildar

The Land Acquisition Officer / Special Deputy Collector, Vs G. Narayanamma