3. The report given by the defacto-complainant who is the Manager of the I.C.I.C.I Bank, dated 14.03.2014 speaks that this petitioner is referred as 2nd accused and her son as 1st accused in referring the report, it is stated that they cheated the Bank in availing the loan facility by obtaining the limitation certificate from the authorised technical valuer and interpolated though the valuation given for Rs.4,50,000/- of the property worth given as collateral security by inserting ‘6’ to make Rs.64,50,000/-. The contention of the petitioner that she is only A-8 and not A-2 is untenable from reading of the said report to say there is a prima facie accusation being privy along with her son for the said acts. However, having regard to the circumstances stated in the petition as well as submissions made by the learned counsel, instead of dismissing from not entitled to the pre-arrest bail, but for regular bail in considering her personal liberty, this application is disposed of, by giving liberty to the petitioner-accused No.8 to surrender before the Learned Judge/Magistrate concerned to take into custody under Section 44 Cr.P.C by virtue of this order, move before the learned Magistrate for regular bail and with notice to learned Assistant Public Prosecutor concerned and in such an event, the learned Judge/Magistrate shall consider for granting of bail in favour of the petitioner with necessary conditions preferably on the same day if not atleast by the next day.
