A criminal petition for dismissal was discontinued as petitioners neither appeared nor represented themselves despite listing, leading to dismissal for non-prosecution; related miscellaneous petitions were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
CRIMINAL PETITION No.8249 OF 2010
O R D E R:
No representation is made on behalf of the petitioners though the matter is listed under the caption “For Dismissal”. It seems that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute the matter.
Hence, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
_____________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J
Date: 26.11.2014 PNV
Petitioners
T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
