Company Application filed for directing complaint registration was dismissed as withdrawn by the learned counsel for the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy
Company Application No.156 of 2014 in Company Petition No.30 of 2012
Dated 25.08.2014
Between:
M/s.R.N.Marwah & Company Rep. by its Managing Partner Mr.Raghu Marwah
…Petitioner
And
M/s.Quinn Logistics India Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director
…Respondent
Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.Dhulipala V.A.S.Ravi Prasad
Counsel for the respondent: Mr.M.V.Pratap Kumar
The Court made the following:
Order:
This Company Application is filed for the following relief:
“to direct a complaint to be registered against the Deponent/Non-
Applicant (i.e., Mr.Robert Dix) under Section 340 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.”
At the hearing, Mr.Dhulipalla V.A.S.Ravi Prasad, learned Counsel for the applicant, has submitted that his client has instructed him to withdraw this Company Application. Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned Counsel for the applicant, the Company Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J)
Dt: 25th August, 2014 LUR
M/s.R.N.Marwah & Company Rep. by its Managing Partner Mr.Raghu Marwah
M/s.Quinn Logistics India Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director
C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
