This court dismissed a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal as infructuous based on the submission that the cause of action no longer survives for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.960 of 2014
JUDGMENT : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Subhash Reddy)
Sri Ginjupalli Subba Rao, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, submits that the cause in the subject matter of this appeal does not survive for adjudication and the appeal has become infructuous.
2. Recording the said submission, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.
JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA 10.11.2014
skmr
R.Subhash Reddy
A.Shankar Narayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
