The petitioner filed a contempt case alleging violation of an order dated 26-03-2014. The respondent apologized and explained inability to implement aspects due to court orders. The court found no violation on the facts.
The contempt case filed by the petitioner against the respondent was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
Contempt Case No.707 of 2014
Date: 31-10-2014
Between:
G. Janardhana Rao
.. Petitioner
AND
B. Vijay Kumar, the Divisional Forest Officer
.. Respondent
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
Contempt Case No.707 of 2014
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed stating that the respondent has violated the order dated 26-03-2014 passed by this Court in W.P.No.9409 of 2014.
The case of the petitioner is that the respondent has not implemented the orders passed by this court in W.P.No.9409 of 2014 even after receipt of the said orders.
The respondent filed his counter stating that upon receipt of the court orders, the building is kept as it is without attending to balance works viz., electrical fixers, fans, tubes, bulbs etc., which would have enabled to allot the said quarters to the Front line staff working in Kotturu Forest section in the large interest of Forest and Wildlife Protection in that area and that though notice is issued for the forfeiture of FSD, the same could not implement owing to the court orders. It is further stated that the respondent has got great respect towards the orders passed by this court, he never
violated the said order and he offered his unconditional apology. In view of the averments stated in the counter affidavit, I do not find any violation of the orders passed by this court in W.P.No.9409 of 2014 by the respondent, and hence, the contempt case is liable to be dismissed.
Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed.
_____________________ A. RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
Date: 31-10-2014
Ksn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent violated the order dated 26-03-2014 in W.P.No.9409 of 2014.
G. Janardhana Rao
B. Vijay Kumar
A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
