In a contempt case alleging violation of previous court orders, respondents appeared complying with terms. The court recorded submissions and dismissed the petition without adjudication.
Contempt case closed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
Contempt Case No.333 of 2014 Date: 24-11-2014
Between:
P. Ravi Varma Babu and another AND
.. Petitioners
K. Santosh Rao and 3 others
.. Respondents
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY Contempt Case No.333 of 2014
ORDER:
The present contempt case is filed by the petitioners alleging violation of the orders dated 11-02-2014 passed by this Court in W.P.No.3760 of 2014 by the respondents.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the respondents states on instructions that the order dated 11-02-2014 in W.P.No.3760 of 2014 has been complied with and nothing remains to be adjudicated in the contempt case, for which the learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the same.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is, accordingly, closed. No costs.
_____________________ A. RAJASHEKER REDDY, J Date: 24-11-2014 Ksn
P. Ravi Varma Babu
another
K. Santosh Rao
3 others
A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
