The writ petitions were dismissed due to a report from the petitioner's counsel stating there were no instructions. No substantive issue was debated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Writ Petition Nos. 5637 and 5672 of 1999
Dated: 14-02-2013
Between: T.Srinivas Reddy. …Petitioner And The Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad and others.
…Respondents.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Writ Petition Nos. 5637 and 5672 of 1999
Oral order (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
It is represented by Ms. K.Prabhavathi, learned counsel representing Sri S.Ravi, learned Senior Counsel that despite letters addressed to the petitioner, there is no response and no instructions from the petitioner. In the circumstances, the counsel reports “no instructions”.
In view of the submission on behalf of the counsel for the petitioner, the writ petitions are dismissed. No costs.
_________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J
14th February, 2013
_______________________________ M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
GRR
T. Srinivas Reddy
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad
Godagrham Nageswara Rao
M.s. Ramachandra Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
