A single judge disposed of a writ petition by dismissing it, relying on the ratio of the Supreme Court in P. Nageswara Rao vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh (1994).
The writ petition was dismissed with no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI And
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
WRIT PETITION No.4942 of 2003
Dated: 02.09.2013
| Between: | |
|---|---|
| G.Venkata Surya Rao | .. Petitioner |
| And | |
| The Deputy Transport Commissioner & | |
| Secretary, Eluru. | |
| .. Respondent |
HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI
And
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
WRIT PETITION No.4942 of 2003
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Ms. Justice G.Rohini)
It is represented by the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents that the issue involved in this case is squarely covered by the decision of the Apex Court in P.Nageswara Rao Vs.
Government of Andhra Pradesh[1] .
Accordingly, following the ratio laid down by the Supreme Court, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs.
_____________ G.ROHINI, J
__________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J
Date: 02.09.2013 KLP
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable given the decision in P.Nageswara Rao vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
P. Nageswara Rao v. Government of Andhra PradeshRelied on¶11
P.Nageswara Rao Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh
1994 SPPL (2) SCC 693Referred¶17
1994 SPPL(2) SCC 693 · Who else cites this
G. Venkata Surya Rao
The Deputy Transport Commissioner & Secretary, Eluru
G.ROHINI
CHALLA KODANDA RAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
