Allowed

Poojari Mallesh, v. The Secretary

Telangana HC19 Feb 2013WP/4866/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A heavy goods vehicle was seized for overload. The court disposed of the writ petition by directing release upon payment of a specific penalty per tonne of overload, offsetting excess load to the spot, and treating the excess as public property.

What did the court decide?

The vehicle to be released after payment of penalty (Rs.1000/tonne for first 15% overload; Rs.2000/tonne for excess) and immediate off-loading of excess goods to public property.

Poojari Mallesh, Vs The Secretary — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2013)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4866 of 2013

¶2

ORDER:

¶3

Petitioner is the owner of a heavy goods vehicle bearing No. AP 22 TA 1215. On 17-02-2013, it was seized by the 2^nd respondent on the ground that it was overloaded by about 18,650 kgs. The petitioner challenges the check report, under which the vehicle was seized.

¶4

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Transport.

¶5

In the recent past, the heavy goods vehicles are loaded in excess of their capacity leading to damage to the roads. In certain cases, the authorities are passing orders suspending the permits depending upon the extent of overload. It is not known as to whether any order of suspension of permit has been passed against the petitioner.

¶6

The Motor Vehicles Act and the Rules made thereunder provide for levy of penalty to the extent of Rs.1000/- per tonne of overload. The continued seizure of the vehicle that too in a loaded condition would cause heavy damage to the vehicle. At the same time, the greed of the owners of the vehicles cannot be permitted to damage and spoil the roads on account of undue overload. While an inadvertent overload to an extent of 15% can be condoned by collecting the penalty at the rate of

¶7

Rs.1,000/- per tonne, any overload exceeding that must be penalised through levy of double the amount.

¶8

Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, directing that the respondents shall release the vehicle in question by collecting the penalty of Rs.1,000/- per tonne for overload up to an extent of 15% of the maximum carrying capacity of the vehicle as entered in Registration Certificate and at the rate of Rs.2,000/per tonne for any overload in excess of 15% of such capacity. Further, the release shall be only after the overload in the vehicle is off-loaded on the spot. The quantity so overloaded shall be treated as public property for being used for public purpose, on allotment by the concerned Tahsildar. The respondents shall return the original documents pertaining to the vehicle, if taken from the petitioner, duly retaining copies thereof. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶9

The miscellaneous petition filed in this writ petition shall also stand disposed of.

¶10

________________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

¶11

Dt:19.02.2013 Note: Issue c.c. tomorrow. (B/o) kdl

Poojari Mallesh, v. The Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Poojari Mallesh, v. The Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Methuku Ravindranath Vs Sure Krishnamurthy

G.Mujeeb Husain Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its

Hav. J. Srinivasulu, Vs The Director of Sainik Welfare

Chandika v Panduranga Rao, Vs The Election Commission of India

S. Shivarajamma, Vs Sri Kishore

Coromandel Mining and Exports Pvt. Ltd, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh