Allowed

V. Sudhakar Reddy, S/o. Late Krishna Reddy, v. The Govt. of A.P.

Telangana HC2 Sept 2013WP/25569/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge Common Order holding that Registering Authorities cannot insist on No Objection Certificates from Revenue Authorities for document registration. Directs authorities to process documents if they comply with applicable Acts, allowing written refusal reasons only if warranted.

What did the court decide?

Directing Registering Authorities to receive and process documents without insisting on NOCs and register them if they fulfill statutory requirements.

V. Sudhakar Reddy, S/o. Late Krishna Reddy, Vs The… — Landlord and Tenant | Telangana HC (2013)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR

¶2

WRIT PETITION Nos.25568, 25569, 25570 & 25604 of 2013

¶3

Date: 02.09.2013

¶4

W. P. No.25568 of 2013:

¶5

Between:

¶6

E. Chinna Narasamma

¶7

… Petitioner

¶8

And

¶9

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Hyderabad & others

¶10

… Respondents

¶11

¶12

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR

¶13

WRIT PETITION Nos.25568, 25569, 25570 & 25604 of 2013

¶14

COMMON ORDER:

¶15

The grievance of the petitioners in this batch of cases is with regard to the insistence by the registering authorities on production of ‘No Objection Certificates’ (NOCs) from the Revenue Authorities as a condition precedent for receiving and registering the documents presented by them for registration in connection with immovable properties.

¶16

2. This Court has time and again held that there is no legal sanction for the action of the Registration Authorities in insisting upon such certification from the Revenue Authorities before entertaining documents for registration. Further, the Government of Andhra

¶17

Pradesh issued Memo No.49938/Regn.I/A1/2012-4 dated 06.12.2012 requesting the Commissioner and Inspector General of Registration and Stamps, Andhra Pradesh, to instruct all the Registering Officers in the State not to ask for NOCs from the Revenue Authorities before registration and not to act on any such NOCs.

¶18

3. In the light of the above, it is not open to the Registering Authorities to continue to insist upon prior certification by the Revenue Authorities before receiving and registering documents pertaining to immovable properties.

¶19

4. The writ petitions are accordingly disposed of directing the Registering Authorities concerned to receive and process the documents presented by the petitioners without insisting upon such NOCs and in the event the documents presented fulfil the requirements of the Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, they shall register and release the documents in accordance with the due procedure. If, however, the Registering Authority concerned is of the opinion that the document presented for registration warrants denial, he shall pass orders in writing indicating the reasons for such refusal and communicate the same to the party in accordance with Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908. Pending W.P.M.Ps in this batch of cases shall stand closed in the light of this final order. No order as to costs.

¶20

________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J

¶21

Date: 02.09.2013 BSS/VHB

V. Sudhakar Reddy, S/o. Late Krishna Reddy, v. The Govt. of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V. Sudhakar Reddy, S/o. Late Krishna Reddy, v. The Govt. of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Syed Saifuddin Quadri, Vs The Ap State Wakf Board

Ch.Kishore Kumar, Vs The Singareni Collieries Company Limited

Kasine Seethaiah Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

T.Chandrasekhar Reddy, Vs The A.P. Mineral Development Corporation Ltd.

E. Chinna Narasamma Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

P. Zamin Hussain Vs The A.P. State Wakf Board