Single-paragraph order dismissing the writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner's counsel was absent despite the case being listed for dismissal under the caption 'for dismissal'.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.25152 of 2011
DATE: 25.06.2013
Between:
N.Venkata Ramana.
.... Petitioner
And
The Ed. CET-2011, rep. by its Convener, Department of Education, I.A.S.E., Osmania University, Hyderabad And others
.... Respondents
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.25152 of 2011
ORDER:
Counsel for the petitioner absent, in spite of the fact that the case is listed under the caption “for dismissal”.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this petition, shall also stand dismissed.
________________________________ M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
25th June 2013.
siva
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.25152 of 2011
25th June 2013.
siva
N.Venkata Ramana
The Ed. CET-2011, rep. by its Convener, Department of Education, I.A.S.E., Osmania University, Hyderabad
M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
