by the order passed by the learned single Judge dismissing the WVMP No.19 of 2013 in W.P.No.38449 of 2012, dated 24.04.2013. 2. The above vacate petition was filed by the appellants to vacate the interim order dt. 14.12.2012 passed in W.P.No.38449 of 2012, which states that ‘if any fresh tender is called for (3rd call), the same shall not be finalized, pending further orders’. 3. The learned single Judge, after taking into consideration all the aspects, came to the conclusion that if in respect of another item of work, a tender has quoted lesser price, the same cannot constitute a proper ground for rejection of the lowest offer, more so when higher tender for another reach was accepted. Accordingly, the learned single Judge refused to vacate the interim order dt. 14.12.2012 and dismissed the vacate petition. The learned single Judge has rightly refused to vacate the interim order and we do not find any irregularity or error in the said order. 4. However, as it is represented before us that already counters are filed in the main writ petition, we only request the learned single Judge to hear the main writ petition itself and dispose of the same expeditiously, preferably within four weeks. 5. The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed accordingly. No costs.
