The court permitted the appellant to withdraw the writ petition. Consequently, the writ appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, and pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.
Permission to withdraw the writ appeal granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
W.A.No.1209 of 2013
Between:
Bheemshetty Naveen Kumar
…….. Appellant
and The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation and others
…… Respondents
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
W.A.No.1209 of 2013
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice N.V. Ramana)
Learned counsel for the Appellant seeks permission of the
Court to withdraw this writ appeal.
Permission is granted.
Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
No order as to costs.
N.V. RAMANA, J
____________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J
Date: 17-07-2013 YCR
Bheemshetty Naveen Kumar
The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation and others
N.V. Ramana
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
