The Criminal Petition was dismissed as infructuous on the sole ground advised by the counsel representing the petitioner. No substantive legal reasoning or precedent was discussed in this order.
The criminal petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.6491 of 2010
Date: 21.03.2013
Between:
S.Venkat Rao, S/o.Veeraiah, Aged about 40 years, R/o.H.No.4-17, Kacharam Kunavaram, Khammam District.
..... Petitioner.
AND
The State of A.P., Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., and others.
.....Respondents/Complainant.
The Court made the following:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR
CRIMINAL PETITION No.6491 of 2010
ORDER:
Sri B.Yadaiah, learned counsel representing the petitioner submitted that the criminal petition has become infructuous.
Hence, the criminal petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
___________________ K.G.SHANKAR, J 21.03.2013 vhb/isn
S.Venkat Rao
The State of A.P.
K.G.SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
