The court dismissed a Company Petition for non-prosecution due to the absence of the petitioner and their counsel during the listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
COMPANY PETITION No.106 of 2011
ORDER:
Since none appeared for the petitioner on 20.01.2012, the Comp Petition was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal”. Tod though the Company Petition is listed under the caption “for dismiss neither is the Counsel for the petitioner present nor is there representation on his behalf.
The Company Petition is, therefore, dismissed for
non-prosecution.
____________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN
21.08.2012 vs
Petitioner
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
