Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as neither the appellant nor counsel appeared on the date of hearing, despite the matter being listed for dismissal pursuant to absence on a previous date.
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution; pending miscellaneous petitions in the appeal are also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH &
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA
C.M.A.NO.867 OF 2001
Date: 28-02-2013
Between: Palepu Venkateswarlu … APPELLANT And Palepu Chinna Ramakrishnaiah & 3 others … RESPONDENTS
The Court delivered the following:
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH
&
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA
C.M.A.NO.867 OF 2001
JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice V.Eswaraiah )
As none appeared for the appellant and there was no representation on 27-02-2013, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal' today.
2. Even today when the matter is called neither the counsel nor the appellant is present in-spite of the matter being listed under the caption 'For Dismissal'.
3. In the circumstances, the appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
______________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J
_______________________ B.N.RAO NALLA, J
28th February, 2013. Jsk/Nrg
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH & HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA
C.M.A.NO.867 OF 2001
Dated 28-02-2013
Nrg/Jsk
Palepu Venkateswarlu
Palepu Chinna Ramakrishnaiah
V. Esvaraiah
B. Rao Nalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
