A contempt petition was dismissed because the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the underlying order had been complied with.
Contempt case dismissed with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
CONTEMPT CASE No.846 of 2012 in W.P.M.P. No.8259 of 2012 in WRIT PETITION No.6508 of 2012
Date: February 01, 2013
Between: Amilineni Jana Bayamma. … Petitioner
and
Kanaka Narasa Reddy … Respondent
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
CONTEMPT CASE No.846 of 2012 in W.P.M.P. No.8259 of 2012 in WRIT PETITION No.6508 of 2012
O R D E R:
Sri Hema Chandra, learned counsel representing Sri J.N. Bhushan, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the order, which is the subject matter of this contempt case, has since been complied with.
2. The Contempt Case is accordingly dismissed. No costs.
_________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J
Date: February 01, 2013.
BSB
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
CONTEMPT CASE No.846 of 2012 in W.P.M.P. No.8259 of 2012 in WRIT PETITION No.6508 of 2012
Date: February 01, 2013
BSB
Amilineni Jana Bayamma
Kanaka Narasa Reddy
Sanjay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
