Court dismissed a contempt case filed for alleged disobedience to a prior order, noting that the petitioners stated the order had been complied with.
Contempt case dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
C.C.No.2200 of 2012
in
W.P.M.P.No.33874 of 2012
in
W.P.No.19115 of 2012
Date: 15.02.2013
Between:
1. B.Narsa Raju and another.
… Petitioners
And
1. Karikal Valaven and two others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
C.C.No.2200 of 2012
in
W.P.M.P.No.33874 of 2012
in W.P.No.19115 of 2012
O R D E R :
This contempt case was filed alleging disobedience to the order dated 12-10-2012 passed by this Court in W.P.M.P.No.33874 of 2012 in W.P.No.19115 of 2012. It is now stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the order has been complied with.
2. The contempt case is accordingly dismissed. No costs.
________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J
Date: 15.02.2013. ssp/bsb
B.Narsa Raju and another
Karikal Valaven and two others
Sanjay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
