Disposed

P.P.Venkataramana v. Sri Purushotham Naik

Telangana HC24 Dec 2013CC/1311/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court dismissed a contempt petition filed against respondents (Respondents No.1 and 2) for alleged wilful disobedience of a High Court order. The court allowed the contempt case to be closed since the respondents had complied with the order despite some administrative delay.

What did the court decide?

The contempt case was closed; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions stood closed.

P.P.Venkataramana Vs Sri Purushotham Naik — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

¶5

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1331 OF 2022

¶6

Contempt Case Under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondents herein for, wilful disobedience of the Order of the High Court dated 17.02.2022 in l.A. No. 1OF 2022 in W.P. No.8653 OF 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

Soma Krishna, S/o Vittaiah, aged about 51 years, Occu. G.H.M. Gr.ll, Z.P.H.S., Velimala, R.C. Puram Mandal, Sanga Reddy District. (1D.No.1800315).

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

Smt. Devasena, l.A.S, Director of School Education, Govt. of T.S., Hyderabad.

¶12

Sri. Sandeep Kumar Sultania, l.A.S, Principal Secretary, School Education Department, The State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

Counsel for the Petitioner :SRl. M RAMGOPAL RAO

¶15

Counscl for the Respondent No.l& 2: GP FOR SERVICE-l

¶16

Thc Court made thc following: ORDER

¶17

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR

l33l of 2022

CONTEMPT CASE

OFIDER:

None appears for the petitioner in the morning session and even in the after noon session when the matter is^passed over.

¶22

'l'his Contempt Case has been Iiled by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the order dt.17.O2 .2022 in IA.No. 1 of 2022 in W.P.No.8653 of 2022.

¶23

When the matter is taken up hearing, it is stated by the learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for respondents, that pursuant to the above said order, the respondents disposed of the appeal preferred by the petitioner vide Memo No.Spl/Secretary Peshi/202 I -45O, dt.13.O5.2022.

¶24

Learned Government Pleader further submits that though there has been some delay in implementing the above said order, the same is purely on account of administrative reasons and is neither willful nor wanton.

¶25

Having regard to the fact that the respondents, though with some dclay, have complied with the above order passed by this Court, this Contempt Casc is closed. No order as to costs.

¶26

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending if any shall stand closed. 0

¶27

¶28

Sd/-CH.VENKATESWARLU DEPUTY,BE€ISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// secilffi:orrrcrn

¶29

To,

¶30

Smt. Devasena,^{l.A.S, Directorof School Education'Govt of T S} ' Hyderabad.

¶31

Sri. Sandeep^{Kumar Sultania, l.A.S, Principal} 9e.clgtary,^{School Education} - O"prrtt"""t, The State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶32

One CC to^{SRl. M RAMGOPALRAO Advocate[OPUC]}

¶33

Two CCs to^{GP FORSERVICE-|,HighCourt for the State of Telangana'at} Hyderabad .Y

¶34

Two CD Copies^{</sup> 6. One Spare^CoPY}

HIGH COURT

DATED:3010812022

ORDER

C.C.No.1331 ot 2022

.,.,. BE SIAT l:
oi:
/4,
it; 2 z DEI 2[2 i: 1
\ -.

¶40

('LOSINC T'llE COnvTEMPT CASE.

¶41

P.P.Venkataramana v. Sri Purushotham Naik

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.P.Venkataramana v. Sri Purushotham Naik

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri.Rakesh Kumar, No.930550097, Vs Union of India

D.Venkat Ram Reddy , Pratap Reddy (died) Vs The Dist. Collector, Mahabubangar Dist.

Chinna Geetha Devi Vs Mididoddi Shankaraiah

The Associated Cement Companies Ltd., Vs Chairman-Cum- Presiding Officer

P.P.Venkata Ramana Vs The Executive Director (Hyderabad, Zone)

E.Rama Rao Vs Smt. K.sunita