Sangavarapu Chenchu Venkata Ramachandra Prabhu v. Jonna Seethamma
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed appeal A.S.No.1854 of 2000 as abated because the appellant failed to substitute legal representatives after the death of a party in the underlying suit, rendering the appeal in A.S.No.1635 of 2000 infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Appeal A.S.No.1854 of 2000 dismissed as abated; A.S.No.1635 of 2000 declared infructuous; miscellaneous petitions closed.