The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous upon the counsel's submission that it had become so. The court allowed no costs. No substantive legal proposition or detailed reasoning is recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
WRIT PETITION NO.9221 OF 2003
DATED:30.8.2012
Between: M/s. Veerabrahmendra Pure Drinking Water and Others.
… Petitioners And The District Collector, Nalgonda District and another.
…. Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
WRIT PETITION No.9221 OF 2003
Order:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
__________________________ PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, ACJ
30-8-2012 pnb
M/s. Veerabrahmendra Pure Drinking Water and Others
District Collector, Nalgonda District
another
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
