The petitioner challenged a suspension order. Counsel stated the suspension was revoked and the petitioner resumed work. The court held no further orders were necessary and dismissed the petition.
The writ petition was dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WP NO. 4709 OF 2011
Date of Judgment: 3.2.2012
Between:
B.V. Rao
…Petitioner
and
Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation and others
..Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WP NO. 4709 OF 2011
ORDER:
The petitioner questions suspension order pending enquiry in this writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner now states that the suspension has since been revoked and the petitioner is already working. In view of that, no further orders are necessary. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs.
_________________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J
Dt. 3.2.2012
KR
2 issues framed by the court
Whether further writ relief is necessary when the petitioner's suspension has been revoked and he is already working?
Whether to allow or dismiss a writ petition challenging a suspension order that is no longer in force?
B.V. Rao
Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
