This court disposed of a writ petition challenging inaction due to a subsequent show cause notice issued by the recovery officer, rendering the grievance abated.
Writ petition and connected application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.37271 of 2012
Dated 27.12.2012
Between:
Dr.N.Subba Rao
…Petitioner
And
Assistant Provident Commissioner (Recovery), Guntur
…Respondent
Counsel for the petitioner: Sri M.V.J.K.Kumar
Counsel for respondent: Sri R.N.Reddy, standing counsel for Employees Provident Fund Organisation
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The purported inaction of the respondent in passing the order despite directions contained in the order dated 27.01.2011 passed by this Court in W.P.No.13371 of 2005 is assailed in this writ petition.
At the hearing, Sri R.N.Reddy, learned standing counsel for the respondent placed before the Court a copy of the show cause notice dated 20.12.2012, whereunder the recovery officer of the office of the respondent has called upon the petitioner to show cause why the dues mentioned therein shall not be recovered.
Sri M.V.J.K.Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of issuance of the show cause notice, the grievance with which his client has filed this writ petition stands abated. He further submitted that he will advise his client to submit his response to the said show cause notice.
In the light of the subsequent events referred to above, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
As a sequel, W.P.M.P.No.47290 of 2012 shall stand disposed of as infructuous.
________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
27th December, 2012 GHN
Dr. N. Subba Rao
Assistant Provident Commissioner (Recovery), Guntur
C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
