The petitioner sought permission to withdraw a writ petition to approach the Government for an exemption from property tax under Section 202(1) of the GHMC Act, 1955. The Court granted permission to withdraw the petition.
Permission was accorded to withdraw the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.25828 of 2011
Dated:23.04.2012
Between:
Sri Venkateshwara Educational Society.
Petitioner
And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad, And another.
... Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.25828 of 2011
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao)
After making submissions for some time, the Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and approach the Government for seeking exemption from payment of property tax under Section 202(1) of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955.
Permission is accorded, and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate
authority. The miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J)
________________________________ (G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY, J)
23.04.2012 vs
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Venkateshwara Educational Society.
The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad
V.V.S.RAO
G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
