Disposed

Sayyad Khadar Bhasha v. The Assistant Director of Mines and Geology (Vigilance)

Telangana HC21 Aug 2012WP/25455/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Honourable Court disposed of Writ Petition questioning the seizure of petitioner's tractor and trailer, directing release upon payment of penalty and undertaking against illegal sand transportation.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to release seized tractor and trailer subject to payment of penalty and undertaking against illegal sand transportation.

Sayyad Khadar Bhasha Vs The Assistant Director of Mines… — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2012)

¶1

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.25455 of 2012

¶3

Dt:- 21.08.2012

¶4

Between:-

¶5

Sayyad Khadar Bhasha

¶6

… Petitioner

¶7

and

¶8

The Assistant Director, Mines & Geology and another

¶9

… Respondents

¶10

This Court made the following:-

¶11

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU

¶12

WRIT PETITION No.25455 of 2012

¶13

ORDER: -

¶14

This Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in seizing the Tractor bearing No.AP 26 AN 2156 & trailer bearing No.AP 26 AN 2157 belonging to the petitioner.

¶15

2. When the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in similar circumstances, this Court disposed of W.P.No.29236 of 2010 on 23.11.2010 directing the respondent-authorities to release the seized vehicle subject to the petitioner therein producing the receipt showing payment of penalty amount along with the ownership documents. Learned counsel for petitioner prays for disposal of this Writ Petition also with the same directions, for which, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, reported no objection.

¶16

3. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to release the Tractor bearing No.AP 26 AN 2156 & trailer bearing No.AP 26 AN 2157 belonging to the petitioner

¶17

subject to his producing the official receipts showing payment of penalty amount as contemplated under the A.P. Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966, framed under the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957, along with the ownership documents and also with a condition that the vehicles shall not be used for illegal transportation of sand and also other than the purpose for which the permit was granted. The petitioner shall give undertaking to the respondents that he shall not use the vehicle for illegal transportation of sand. The miscellaneous applications, if any, stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶18

________________ K.C. BHANU, J

¶19

21.08.2012 Note: Issue C.C. by 22.08.2012 {B/o} lmv

¶20

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU

¶21

WRIT PETITION No.25455 of 2012

¶22

21.08.2012

¶23

lmv

Sayyad Khadar Bhasha v. The Assistant Director of Mines and Geology (Vigilance)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sayyad Khadar Bhasha v. The Assistant Director of Mines and Geology (Vigilance)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Premier Travels, represented by its Vs The Regional Transport Officer

C. Narayan Reddy Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Smt.T.S.Jhansi Rani, W/o. Late T.S. Hemanth Kumar Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

V.Narsaiah Vs Sri Linga Murthy

P.Saravaiah Vs The Assistant Director of Mines and Geology

A.Elagonda, Vs Sri a.K.Khan