The court dismissed Writ Petition No.23422 of 2000 for default due to the absence of the petitioner or their counsel during the hearing, despite a vakalat on record.
Writ petition dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.23422 of 2000
ORDER (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram):
When called for hearing this Writ Petition of the year 2000, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, though the name of Sri S. Krishna Murthy, the learned counsel who filed vakalat on behalf of the petitioner, is reflected in the cause list.
Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.
JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
Date: 19.12.2012
JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
va
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.23422 of 2000 (order of the Bench delivered by the Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
Date: 19.12.2012
va
Goda Raghuram
M.S.Ramachandra Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
