The High Court accepted the counsel's submission that the cause in the writ petition no longer survived for adjudication and dismissed the petition as infructuous without recording a detailed headnote.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWELVE
PRESENT
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
WRIT PETITION No.202 OF 2011
Between:
K.V.S. Rama Raju. - - - Petitioner. AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Law Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and another. - - - Respondents.
This Court made the following :
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
WRIT PETITION No.202 OF 2011
ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in this writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, filed in this writ petition shall stand closed.
_________________ K.C. BHANU, J.
Date.06.08.2012. Dsh.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
66
WRIT PETITION No.202 OF 2011
August 06, 2012
DSH
K.V.S. Rama Raju
Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Law Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and another
K.C. BHANU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
