V.Sathamma, v. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY , THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWELVE :PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WP .NO:17003 of 2000
Between: V.Sathamma, W/o Late Buchaiah,
..... Petitioner
AND
- 1 The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Barkathpura, Hyderabad.
- 2 The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Sub-Regional Office, Warangal.
- 3 The Nagarjuna Grameena Bank, KHAMMAM.
.....Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or orders, direction or direction directing the Respondents 1 and 3 to settle and pay the Provident Fund and Pentionery benefits due to the Petitioner on account of the death of her husband while working the 3rd Respondent Bank and also direct them to pay interest on belated payments;
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.Sathamma
- respondent
The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Barkathpura, Hyderabad
- respondent
The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Sub-Regional Office, Warangal
- respondent
The Nagarjuna Grameena Bank, KHAMMAM
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/17003/2000
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court