Disposed
Mrs. Touseef Hamaira v. State of A.P.
Telangana HCWP/14518/1999
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TEN
:PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
W.P. NOs : 15105, 14518, and 15106 of 1999
W.P.No.15105/1999:
Between:
K.Ramakrishna S/o K.Ratnaiah,
..... Petitioner
AND
.....Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction especially one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to absorb and regularise the services of the petitioner as Lecturer in Chemistry on and from the date of completion of 5 years of part-time service and accord all consequential and other attendant benefits;
W.P.No. 14518/1999: Between:
1. Mrs. Touseef Hamaira D/o. S.A.Manan
2. K.Subba Rao s/o.K.SEshagiri Rao
3. Mrs. L.B.T.Sundari D/o.Sri L.V.Ramana
4. S.Upender Reddy s/o. S.Janakiram Reddy.
And
1. State of A.P. rep.by its Secretary to the Govt., Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Commissioner of Collegiate Education., Govt. of A.P., Hyderabad
3. Sarojini Naidu Vanitha Mahavidyalaya, Exhibition Grounds, Hyderabad, rep.by its Correspondent.
Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction especially one in the
-2-
nature of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents herein to absorb/regularise the services of the petitioners as Lecturers in the respective subjects in terms of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India by reckoning the minimum service as on the date of regularisation without reference to the cut of date and accord all consequential and other attendant benefits as regards scale of pay and such other benefits;
W.P.No. 15106/1999: Between:
Smt. K. Bharathi D/o. K.Sripathi Reddy.
… Petitioner
1. State of A.P. rep.by its Secretary to Govt., Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Commissioner of Collegiate Education., Govt. of A.P.,
4. Women’s College, Nizamabad, rep.by its Secretary and Correspondent.
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction especially one in the
nature of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents herein to regularise/ absorb the petitioner as Lecturer in History in terms of various G.Os., guidelines, schemes and judgment of the Hon’ble Courts as she is eligible and qualified having completed more than 5 years of service without reference to any cut-off date and accord all consequential and other benefits as regards, salary, seniority etc.,
These petitions coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petitions and the affidavits filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Y. Venkat Sastri Advocate for the petitioners in all W.Ps., and of the Govt. Pleader for Higher Education for the respondents 1 to 3 in all W.Ps., the Court made the following:
Contd..
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1. The Secretary to Govt., Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Commissioner of Collegiate Education., Govt. of A.P., Hyderabad
5. The Correspondent, Sarojini Naidu Vanitha Mahavidyalaya, Exhibition
Grounds, Hyderabad.
6. The Secretary and Correspondent, Women’s College, Nizamabad. ( 1 to 6 by RPAD)
7. 2 CCs to the Govt. Pleader for Higher Education, High court of A.P.Hyd.(BY SPL. MESSENGER)
8. One C.C.to Sri Y.Venkat Sastri Advocate. (OPUC)
9. one spare copy.
HIGH COURT
NRR.J
DATED 5-07-2010
POST THESE CASES FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION AFTER THREE WEEKS.
ORDER
W.P.NOs. 15105, 14518, AND 15106 OF 1999
DIRECTION
Bsr Dt. 7-7-2010
HIGH COURT
NRR.J
DATED 5-07-2010
POST THESE CASES FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION AFTER THREE WEEKS.
ORDER
W.P.NOs. 15105, 14518, AND 15106 OF 1999
DIRECTION
K. Ramakrishna
State of Andhra Pradesh
Commissioner of Collegiate Education
College Service Commission
Touseef Hamaira
Sarojini Naidu Vanitha Mahavidyalaya
Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court